Transconductance & control variables
Turn each transistor’s nonlinear transfer law into a local control strength at its DC operating point. Define gm as a partial derivative with the output voltage held fixed, derive gm=IC/VT for the exponential BJT model, derive the JFET gm relation from the Shockley transfer curve with VP<0, and derive gm=kVOV=2ID/VOV for the long-channel saturated MOSFET. Compare gm/ID, distinguish intrinsic device gm from the effective transconductance seen through source/emitter degeneration, and quantify when a local linear approximation stops being accurate.
- Define transconductance dimensionally as gm=(∂Iout/∂Vcontrol)|Q with the other independent terminal voltage held fixed.
- Derive BJT gm=ICQ/VT from the forward-active exponential law and explain why β is not needed for this intrinsic derivative.
- Derive n-JFET gm=−(2IDSS/VP)(1−VGS/VP) for the declared VP<0 transfer model and rewrite it in terms of ID/IDSS.
- Derive long-channel saturated nMOS gm=kVOV=2ID/VOV=sqrt(2kID).
- Distinguish MOS triode-region ∂ID/∂VGS=kVDS from saturation-region gm and explain why gm is operating-region dependent.
- Compare the bias-point gm values of the BJT, JFET and MOS worked examples from chapter 02 with correct SI units.
- Define transconductance efficiency gm/ID and derive 1/VT for the ideal exponential BJT and 2/VOV for the long-channel saturated MOS model.
- Distinguish intrinsic device gm from an externally observed current/control-voltage slope after source or emitter degeneration.
- Derive gm,ext≈gm/(1+gmRS) for a FET with unbypassed source resistance under the stated small-signal assumptions.
- Use second derivatives/Taylor terms to explain why gm is local and why larger signal excursions create distortion even when the DC operating region does not change.
Bias fixes where a transistor operates. Transconductance tells us how strongly a small change of the control voltage changes the main current at that particular point.
03.1gm is a partial derivative with units of siemens
Figure 3.1 — gm is the local slope at Q
The one question is: what does the tangent to the transfer curve measure?
The tangent slope depends on the bias point. A transistor family therefore does not have one gm independent of Q.
For the BJT we normally mean ∂IC/∂VBE at fixed VCE within the chosen active model. For JFET/MOSFET we normally mean ∂ID/∂VGS at fixed VDS within the chosen region.
The “other voltage fixed” clause matters: output-voltage dependence is a different derivative, later represented by output conductance.
03.2BJT gm follows directly from the exponential law
Using the forward-active exponential model
differentiate at Q:
β is absent from this intrinsic derivative. β matters for base current and input resistance, but the ideal collector-current sensitivity to VBE follows from the exponential transport law.
At 300 K and ICQ≈1.90 mA from chapter 02,
03.3JFET gm from the transfer curve
With the chapter-02 convention VP<0 and
differentiate:
Because VP<0 and the bracket is nonnegative in the valid transfer interval, gm is positive. Define
For IDSS=8 mA, VP=−4 V, VGS=−2 V and ID=2 mA, gm0=4 mS and gm=2 mS.
03.4MOS gm depends on operating region
For long-channel saturation without channel-length modulation,
therefore
For the chapter-02 point k=1 mA/V² and VOV=2 V, gm=2 mS.
In the long-channel triode equation
holding VDS fixed gives
So “the MOSFET gm” is incomplete without a bias point and region.
03.5Compare gm at the three worked bias points
Equal DC current does not imply equal gm. The BJT exponential law gives a much steeper local current-versus-control-voltage slope at this particular comparison point.
That observation alone does not rank complete amplifiers: input current, noise, headroom, capacitance, output resistance, power and technology constraints also matter.
03.6gm/ID is a transconductance-efficiency metric
Normalize local control strength by DC current:
For the ideal BJT exponential model,
At 300 K this is about 38.7 V⁻¹. For the long-channel MOS saturation square law,
At VOV=2 V the example gives 1 V⁻¹. This is a model-level comparison; modern MOS design spans weak/moderate/strong inversion where the square-law expression does not cover the full gm/ID behavior.
03.7Intrinsic gm is not always the gm seen from the external input node
Figure 3.2 — Source degeneration reduces externally observed transconductance
The one question is: why does source resistance turn current change into negative feedback?
An increase in id raises vs=idRS, which reduces vgs=vg−vs and therefore opposes the original current increase.
For a FET small-signal model with drain-current increment id=gm vgs, negligible gate current and source resistance RS, let the external input be vg:
Then
The transistor’s intrinsic gm did not change; the circuit added negative feedback.
For a BJT with unbypassed emitter resistance and finite β, an analogous first model gives approximately gm,ext=gm/[1+gm(1+1/β)RE] for collector current versus base-voltage increment under the stated hybrid-π assumptions.
03.8gm is local because nonlinear curvature remains
For the BJT exponential law, the incremental collector current contains
so the quadratic/linear magnitude ratio is approximately |vbe|/(2VT).
For the MOS square-law saturation model,
and the corresponding ratio is |vgs|/(2VOV). Local linearization therefore has an amplitude-dependent error even if the device stays in the same DC region throughout the waveform.
03.9Control variable and output dependence are separate derivatives
A realistic transistor current generally depends on both a control voltage and an output voltage:
gm is the control derivative; go is the output derivative. Treating one as the other causes incorrect gain and output-resistance predictions. Chapter 04 will place both terms into complete small-signal equivalent circuits.
03.10Mastery exercises
- At 300 K, find BJT gm for IC=0.5 mA.
- For IDSS=12 mA, VP=−6 V and VGS=−3 V, find JFET gm.
- For long-channel MOS saturation with k=2 mA/V² and VOV=0.5 V, find ID and gm.
- For the same MOS bias, find gm/ID.
- A FET has gm=5 mS and RS=200 Ω. Estimate gm,ext.
- Why is gm=∂ID/∂VGS incomplete unless VDS and region are specified?
- For a BJT at 300 K, what |vbe| makes the quadratic Taylor term about 10% of the linear term?
- For a MOS square law with VOV=0.2 V, what |vgs| gives the same 10% ratio?
Solutions
1. 0.5 mA/25.85 mV≈19.3 mS.
2. gm0=2IDSS/|VP|=4 mS; at VGS=−3 V the factor is 0.5, so gm=2 mS.
3. ID=(2/2)(0.5²) mA=0.25 mA; gm=kVOV=1 mS.
4. gm/ID=4 V⁻¹.
5. 5 mS/(1+0.005·200)=2.5 mS.
6. Because the local current slope can depend on both output bias and operating-region equation.
7. |vbe|≈0.2VT≈5.17 mV.
8. |vgs|≈0.2VOV=40 mV.
Chapter 04 will turn these local derivatives into complete BJT/JFET/MOS small-signal equivalent circuits, including input and output paths.