Norton equivalence and maximum power transfer
The dual current-source view, and why maximum power is not the same as maximum efficiency.
- Convert exactly between Thévenin and Norton forms.
- Compute load current naturally from the Norton model.
- Derive the maximum-power condition for a resistive source and load.
- Explain the 50% efficiency consequence at the maximum-power point.
If Thévenin and Norton are exactly equivalent at the terminals, why keep both forms — and why does a load equal to the source resistance maximize load power but only give 50% efficiency?
This chapter answers both questions from the terminal law, not from memorized source-transformation rules. The goal is to know which equivalent is useful, what “maximum power” actually means, and when matching is or is not the engineering objective.
06.0Prerequisite recap — one terminal line, two source forms
Both equations describe the same straight line in the V–I plane. Matching coefficients immediately gives
06.1Complete equivalence check with one load
Take VTH = 5 V and RTH = 100 Ω. The Norton current is 50 mA. Connect RL = 900 Ω.
Figure 6.1a — Thévenin form
5 V in series with 100 Ω drives the same 900 Ω load.
Figure 6.1b — Norton form
50 mA in parallel with 100 Ω preserves the same terminal V–I law.
In Norton form, the source current divides between RN and RL.
The same load current and voltage appear because the two source forms are the same one-port model.
06.2Derive the maximum-power condition
For a positive resistive source RTH driving a resistive load RL, the load current is
Differentiate with respect to the load resistance while keeping the source model fixed.
The derivative is positive below the match and negative above it, so this stationary point is a maximum.
06.3Worked example — maximum power is not the same as high output voltage
For the 5 V / 100 Ω source, maximum power occurs at RL = 100 Ω.
Compare that with RL = 900 Ω from the earlier example.
The 900 Ω load receives a much larger fraction of the open-circuit voltage, but less power. Voltage transfer and power transfer optimize different quantities.
06.4Why the matched resistive case is only 50% efficient
If RTH represents a real dissipative series resistance, the same current flows through source resistance and load.
At RL = RTH, exactly half of the power is dissipated in each resistance:
06.5See the trade-off with one dimensionless ratio
Define r = RL/RTH. Then three useful normalized quantities are
Large load resistance gives excellent voltage transfer and, for a passive series source resistance, high efficiency — but it extracts little of the source’s maximum available power. Matching gives maximum load power, not maximum voltage and not maximum efficiency.
06.6When should you actually use a power match?
06.7AC extension — conjugate matching
In sinusoidal steady state, the real waveform remains lowercase, for example v(t). AoN writes the associated complex phasor as an underlined lowercase quantity, for example vTH(ω).
Average load power is
First remove unnecessary reactive current by cancelling the source reactance, then apply the resistive optimum:
For example, if ZTH = 50 + j20 Ω, the conjugate-matched load is 50 − j20 Ω.
06.8Independent practice
Problem A — transform and verify
A 12 V Thévenin source has RTH = 600 Ω. Find the Norton form and the load current for RL = 1.8 kΩ.
Problem B — power versus efficiency
For a passive resistive source, choose RL so that efficiency is 80%. What fraction of maximum load power is then obtained?
Problem C — AC match
If ZTH = 35 + j15 Ω, what load maximizes average power under the stated linear AC assumptions?
06.9Mastery checklist
- Derive Norton parameters from the terminal law, not only from a memorized transformation.
- Choose Thévenin or Norton according to the surrounding topology.
- Derive RL = RTH for maximum resistive load power.
- Explain why matched passive resistance gives 50% efficiency.
- Distinguish voltage transfer, maximum power and efficiency as different objectives.
- State and use the conjugate-match condition in AC.