Z and Y matrices from open/short experiments
Obtain impedance and admittance coefficients under controlled port conditions, derive a reciprocal π-network from KCL, invert the matrices, and verify signed power and loading.
- Define Z and Y with both currents referenced entering.
- Extract each impedance coefficient using the correct ideal open condition.
- Extract each admittance coefficient using the correct ideal short condition.
- Give each matrix entry its correct physical unit.
- Derive Y=Z⁻¹ and state the non-singular condition.
- Construct a resistive π-network from a canonical MAJAL schematic.
- Derive its full Y matrix using signed Kirchhoff currents.
- Separate reciprocity, port symmetry and passivity.
- Prove passive power by independent branch dissipation.
- Include the output load with I₂=−Y_LV₂ and audit an example.
We begin with the signed two-port references of RF-03.01: both currents enter the network at the positive voltage terminals. The physical laws are unchanged if we describe the same linear device by its port voltages or currents. In this chapter we derive Z and Y from controlled open/short experiments, compute both matrices for a concrete resistive π network, and verify reciprocity, power and external loading independently.
0102.1 — Two descriptions of one physical device
At a fixed frequency, a linear source-free network can admit a matrix relationship between terminal phasors. The impedance representation treats currents as independent variables and expresses both port voltages as their linear combinations. Because each term must have voltage units, every Z coefficient has units of ohms.
This representation is only valid when the chosen currents define the response uniquely. Ideal constraints can make Z unavailable or singular; the existence of a physical network does not require every imaginable parameter chart to exist. Throughout, I₁ and I₂ follow the same entering-current convention used in RF-03.01.
0202.2 — Z parameters: the other port is open
Setting I₂=0 opens port 2 in the ideal terminal model, but it does not force V₂=0. The first matrix column follows V₁=Z₁₁I₁ and V₂=Z₂₁I₁; divide by nonzero I₁ to measure Z₁₁ and Z₂₁. This is the open-circuit driving-point impedance and the forward transfer impedance.
To obtain the other column, open port 1 by setting I₁=0 and excite port 2. Then V₁=Z₁₂I₂ and V₂=Z₂₂I₂. Do not confuse Z₁₂ with an output-to-input voltage gain: its denominator is a current. In practice an RF open fixture has fringing capacitance and requires a reference-plane model.
0302.3 — Y parameters: the other port is shorted
An admittance description instead imposes port voltages and gives terminal currents. Thus Y has units of siemens, and a zero-voltage boundary condition means an ideal short. With V₂=0 the first column reads I₁=Y₁₁V₁ and I₂=Y₂₁V₁.
With V₁=0, excite port 2 to obtain Y₁₂=I₁/V₂ and Y₂₂=I₂/V₂. A short circuit does not mean that its port current vanishes: the current through the short can be substantial. The signs of the off-diagonal terms depend on keeping both currents referenced into the two-port.
0402.4 — When and how Z and Y are inverses
Write V=ZI. If det Z is nonzero, multiply by Z⁻¹ on the left to obtain I=Z⁻¹V, hence Y=Z⁻¹. For the two-by-two matrix the determinant is Z₁₁Z₂₂−Z₁₂Z₂₁ and the inverse swaps the diagonal terms and negates both off-diagonal terms.
If det Z=0, this inverse does not exist. It is incorrect to divide by zero or to infer that the physical device itself disappears. Some ideal devices admit one representation but not another; numerical inversion also becomes unreliable near a poorly conditioned matrix.
0502.5 — Derive the π-network Y matrix from KCL
Model the actual π network with a shunt conductance G₁ at input node V₁, a shunt G₂ at output node V₂, and a bridge conductance G_b between those nodes. The lower conductors share a reference node. Each branch has positive conductance, so the network is linear, reciprocal and dissipative.
Kirchhoff gives I₁=G₁V₁+G_b(V₁−V₂) and I₂=G₂V₂+G_b(V₂−V₁). Collecting coefficients produces Y₁₁=G₁+G_b, Y₂₂=G₂+G_b and Y₁₂=Y₂₁=−G_b. The negative transfer terms are a consequence of entering currents, not evidence of active gain.
Figure 2.1 — π network and signed port references
Three positive conductances, both currents entering and both voltage arrows minus-to-plus: an explicit KCL topology.
The upper nodes have potentials V₁ and V₂ relative to the common lower conductor. R₁=1/G₁ and R₂=1/G₂ are the shunt branches; R_b=1/G_b bridges the upper nodes. A load current delivered out of port 2 is opposite its defined entering current I₂.
0602.6 — Reciprocity does not replace a power audit
The π network is reciprocal because its transfer admittances are equal. It is not port-interchange symmetric unless G₁=G₂; reciprocity does not require identical input and output driving-point admittances. A passive device can also have loss, so reciprocity alone cannot establish energy conservation without dissipation.
For peak phasors, substitute the signed KCL currents into P_abs=(1/2)Re(V₁I₁*+V₂I₂*). Rearrangement yields the nonnegative sum (G₁|V₁|²+G₂|V₂|²+G_b|V₁−V₂|²)/2. For a general valid Z model, passivity at a real frequency implies its Hermitian part is positive semidefinite; broadband positive-realness additionally demands analytic conditions.
0702.7 — Loading the output without reversing I₂
Attach an external shunt load Y_L to the output port. The current I₂ is defined entering the two-port, whereas load current Y_LV₂ leaves it. Kirchhoff at the connection therefore gives I₂=−Y_LV₂, not +Y_LV₂.
Inserting this condition in the second π-network equation yields (G₂+G_b+Y_L)V₂=G_bV₁. The loaded voltage ratio is G_b/(G₂+G_b+Y_L), and input admittance follows from I₁/V₁=G₁+G_b−G_b²/(G₂+G_b+Y_L). These identities make load/reference signs directly testable.
0802.8 — Complete numerical audit and measurement limits
Take G₁=0.010 S, G₂=0.005 S and G_b=0.020 S. Then Y=[[0.030,−0.020],[−0.020,0.025]] S, det Y=0.00035 S², and its inverse Z has entries 71.4286, 57.1429, 57.1429 and 85.7143 Ω. Multiply YZ to confirm the identity matrix.
With V₁=1 V and V₂=0.4 V using real peak phasors, I₁=0.022 A and I₂=−0.010 A; the network absorbs P=0.009 W. Independent resistive-branch powers sum to the same result. Adding a 0.010 S output load gives V₂/V₁=4/7 and Z_in≈53.846 Ω. Short/open tests in a real RF fixture need de-embedding and calibrated reference planes.
Practice — 10 solved Z/Y and loading problems
- Starting with V=ZI, derive Z₁₁ and Z₂₁ under the ideal open-port-2 condition.
- Which physical boundary condition is imposed by I₁=0, and how is Z₁₂ extracted?
- Derive Y₁₁ and Y₂₁ when port 2 is short-circuited. State the unit of Y₂₁.
- Why does V₂=0 not imply I₂=0? Give a circuit example.
- Compute the determinant and inverse of Z=[[4,1],[1,3]] Ω.
- Derive the signed admittance matrix of the three-resistor π network with shunts G₁,G₂ and bridge G_b.
- Is a π network with G₁≠G₂ reciprocal? Is it symmetric under exchanging the two ports?
- For G₁=0.010 S, G₂=0.005 S, G_b=0.020 S, V₁=1 V, V₂=0.4 V, compute I₁,I₂ and absorbed mean power.
- Verify the preceding power by summing the three resistive-branch dissipations.
- With an output shunt load Y_L=0.010 S, derive I₂ sign, V₂/V₁ and Z_in. Why is using I₂=+Y_LV₂ wrong?
Worked solutions
1. V₁=Z₁₁I₁+Z₁₂I₂ and V₂=Z₂₁I₁+Z₂₂I₂. Set I₂=0, so Z₁₁=(V₁/I₁)|I₂=0 and Z₂₁=(V₂/I₁)|I₂=0, provided I₁≠0. The two voltages can both be nonzero.
2. I₁=0 means port 1 is open, not shorted. Then V₁=Z₁₂I₂, so Z₁₂=(V₁/I₂)|I₁=0 for a nonzero test current I₂. The ratio has units Ω.
3. From I=YV, set V₂=0. Then I₁=Y₁₁V₁, I₂=Y₂₁V₁. Therefore Y₁₁=I₁/V₁ and Y₂₁=I₂/V₁ under the short-port-2 condition; both have units S.
4. An ideal short imposes zero terminal voltage while allowing current to flow. In a resistor bridge from input node V₁ through conductance G_b to a shorted output, the current referenced entering port 2 is I₂=−G_bV₁, generally nonzero.
5. Δ=4·3−1·1=11 Ω². Therefore Z⁻¹=(1/11)[[3,−1],[−1,4]] S. Check Z·Z⁻¹=I explicitly: diagonal products (12−1)/11 and (−1+12)/11 are one, off-diagonals vanish.
6. KCL gives I₁=G₁V₁+G_b(V₁−V₂) and I₂=G₂V₂+G_b(V₂−V₁). Thus Y=[[G₁+G_b,−G_b],[−G_b,G₂+G_b]]. The negative off-diagonal terms come from the current entering the opposite port.
7. Y₁₂=Y₂₁=−G_b, hence the network is reciprocal. Yet Y₁₁=G₁+G_b differs from Y₂₂=G₂+G_b when G₁≠G₂, so it is not invariant under swapping ports.
8. I₁=0.030·1−0.020·0.4=0.022 A. I₂=−0.020·1+0.025·0.4=−0.010 A. For peak phasors P=(1/2)(1·0.022+0.4·(−0.010))=0.009 W.
9. Branch dissipation is (1/2)[0.010(1)²+0.005(0.4)²+0.020(1−0.4)²]=(1/2)(0.010+0.0008+0.0072)=0.009 W. Agreement proves the signed terminal balance for this load-independent test.
10. At the junction, output load current leaves the two-port, hence I₂=−Y_LV₂. Substitute −Y_LV₂=−G_bV₁+(G₂+G_b)V₂, yielding V₂/V₁=0.020/(0.005+0.020+0.010)=4/7. Y_in=0.030−0.020²/0.035≈0.0185714 S and Z_in≈53.846 Ω. A positive I₂=+Y_LV₂ would reverse the physical junction-current convention.
Having obtained both Z and Y from defined terminal experiments, chapter 03 will derive hybrid h parameters from the same signed equations and explain why different matrix representations require different nonzero pivots.