What a vector network analyzer really measures
Understand coherent source/receiver ratios, calibrated S11/S21, external matching, reflection and insertion loss, port-plane phase, basic three-term calibration, and a reproducible 25 Ω / 50 Ω lab experiment.
- Explain why a VNA measures coherent complex wave ratios, not microscopic field maps.
- Define incident/outgoing peak waves and port-current signs.
- Derive S11 and S21 under properly terminated external ports.
- Distinguish a2=0 from b2=0, V2=0 and I2=0.
- Compute return loss, VSWR and reflected power for a 75 Ω load.
- Find S for a series 25 Ω resistor between two 50 Ω ports.
- Check transmitted, reflected and dissipated power independently.
- Explain how a calibrated reference-plane shift changes S phase.
- Invert a three-term one-port systematic-error model.
- Draft a repeatable VNA verification procedure with uncertainties.
A vector network analyzer is a coherent RF source and receiver, not a direct microscope of electric fields. This first RF-05 lesson derives its measured scattering ratios, reflection and transmission power, calibration errors, phase references and a reproducible physical experiment.
0101.1 — A VNA is a coherent source and receiver
A vector network analyzer supplies a swept single-frequency RF signal and compares complex receiver channels referenced to the same coherent source. Its directional sampling distinguishes waves incident on and leaving a calibrated port, including both magnitude and relative phase. This differs from a conventional spectrum analyzer, which primarily measures signal spectral power.
The incident and outgoing wave amplitudes depend on an explicit reference impedance and measurement plane. A VNA cannot directly identify a microscopic material parameter without a model, cannot distinguish every unmeasured radiation channel, and requires linear steady-state DUT behavior for ordinary small-signal S-parameter interpretation.
0201.2 — What the one-port reflection experiment determines
With one real-positive R0 reference and its current entering the positive DUT terminal, define and . A corrected one-port experiment reports the complex ratio under its calibration assumptions.
The reflection contains the interaction of the DUT termination with the selected reference plane. A negative complex S11 is not automatically an active response; it may merely indicate a phase inversion. Moving a probe or cable reference plane rotates the reflection phase even when the physical DUT stays unchanged.
0301.3 — Two-port S21 is not an arbitrary voltage gain
To measure the forward transmission coefficient S21, drive port 1 and arrange the port-2 external environment so a2=0. This means that the receiver or termination sends no incident wave back toward the DUT. The DUT may still send an outgoing b2 and have nonzero V2 and I2.
Driving the other direction with a1=0 yields S12 and S22. The measured matrix describes a specific port and wave normalization, not a loaded transistor voltage gain under an arbitrary output impedance. Bias, calibration, linearity and frequency must be documented for active components.
Figure 5.1 — Signed electrical references of a two-port
Both I₁ and I₂ are defined ENTERING the network at their positive terminals; each voltage arrow points from minus to plus.
I₁ enters the left port pointing right, while I₂ enters the right port pointing left. V₁ and V₂ are positive on the upper terminals. The conventional output current toward an attached load equals −I₂. These arrows define references, not actual solved current flow.
0401.4 — Reflection, return loss and VSWR
For a purely resistive load connected to a lossless real R0 port, . A load ZL= at R0= gives Γ=+; 20% of the voltage amplitude is reflected but only 4% of the incident power.
Return loss is , while . Do not confuse return loss with insertion loss or assume |Γ| gives its phase. Finite calibration directivity is especially important for small reflections.
0501.5 — Transmission and power dissipation of a real resistor
An ideal resistance in series between two real wave-reference ports has Its scattering coefficients are and , independent of frequency only in the ideal lumped model.
For a1 incident with a2=0, reflection takes ²=4% of incident power, and transmission ²=64%. The remaining 32% is dissipated in the resistance. Its insertion loss is , a different quantity from return loss ≈.
0601.6 — Phase and the reference-plane problem
Place a one-port load at and the source on the negative-z side with AoN exp(+jωt). An ideal lossless line section of outward length d=−z moves the reflection phase by . For and , the new phase is −60° with unchanged magnitude.
For a two-port, extending reference planes outward by d1 and d2 shifts S21 phase by −(β1d1+β2d2). Real cables can attenuate, disperse and drift thermally, so raw S phase comparisons require identical calibrated planes. Group delay is meaningful where transmission remains finite and phases can be unwrapped.
0701.7 — Three-term reflection calibration and remaining errors
A common one-port receiver-error model writes measured m as , with directivity E_D, reflection tracking E_R and source match E_S. These parameters describe systematic errors at the chosen planes, not intrinsic properties of the device being measured.
Solve algebraically for ; the denominator may become ill-conditioned. Calibration requires characterized standards including their delays and parasitics, and additional terms appear in two-port calibrations. De-embedding the DUT fixture is a separate operation.
0801.8 — Reproducible first VNA experiment
Begin by recording instrument model and firmware, sweep range, RF source level, IF bandwidth, point count, averaging, connector and cable state, and DUT bias or temperature. Calibrate at clearly identified planes using the correct characterized standards; then check with a verification device that was not used to derive the calibration.
Measure complex S11 and S21 for an accessible well-terminated series resistor network and compare against and only over a frequency span where parasitics are demonstrably negligible. Archive Touchstone with units and port order, report uncertainty and repeat cable connections. Never substitute simple textbook equations for the specifications of a particular compact VNA.
VNA measurement problems and worked solutions
- Explain what a coherent VNA ratio receiver measures and how this differs from a spectrum analyzer.
- Derive S11 from peak V/I waves at a real R0 reference plane.
- Explain what a2=0 means for a forward S21 test and why b2 can be nonzero.
- Calculate Γ, RL, VSWR and reflected-power fraction for a 75 Ω load on a 50 Ω port.
- Calculate all S for an ideal 25 Ω series resistor at two 50 Ω ports.
- Compute the resistor's dissipated-power fraction using both S and physical I²R.
- Translate S11=0.4∠30° outward by λg/8 and identify the new phase.
- Invert the three-term VNA one-port error model to solve for Γ.
- Explain why finite directivity and calibration noise matter near perfect matching.
- Draft a verification experiment using a VNA, archive fields and repeatability checks.
Show worked solutions
1. A coherent VNA sends a controlled single-frequency stimulus and measures the complex ratio of outgoing to incident waves at calibrated ports, including amplitude and relative phase. A standard spectrum analyzer instead emphasizes spectral power at its input and is not automatically a calibrated two-port wave-ratio instrument.
2. For real R0, and , where the current enters the DUT. Their ratio is complex and depends on reference plane and impedance; it is not simply the voltage divided by the current.
3. The condition a2=0 means the externally connected port-2 termination or receiver sends no incoming wave to the DUT. The device can still transmit an outgoing , and V2 and I2 may both be finite. This is not an open-circuit current condition I2=0.
4. . , , and the reflected-power fraction is . The amplitude fraction is not the power fraction .
5. The series resistor ABCD is [1,;0,1]. For R0=, . Thus and , because its ABCD determinant equals one.
6. From S, the absorbed fraction is . For incident peak a1=, current through the resistor is A, giving . Incident power is , so .
7. On a lossless line the reflection phase changes by . With , so the new S11 is . Its magnitude remains 0.4; real cable loss would also change the magnitude.
8. Set . From , multiply to obtain , hence . Therefore . The denominator and standard definitions affect numerical stability.
9. Near a perfect match, the desired reflected signal b1 is small, so finite coupler directivity and leakage can be comparable to the signal. Thermal drift, receiver noise, connection repeatability and imperfect standards bias the reflection; averaging reduces some random noise but not systematic errors.
10. Record VNA revision/firmware, swept band, source power, IFBW, points, averaging, port reference impedance and calibration planes. Calibrate with characterized standards and verify with an independent known load or thru, then measure the DUT, export raw complex S, repeat connections and estimate residual deviations from the circuit model.
Next: calibration reference planes, systematic error boxes and the difference between calibration and fixture de-embedding.