Cutoff and dispersion
Turn the transverse eigenvalue k_c into longitudinal dynamics: derive cutoff, the decaying below-cutoff branch for exp(+jωt−jβz), guide wavelength, phase/group velocities, v_pv_g=v² in a nondispersive filling, TE/TM impedance trends, energy velocity and numerical propagation audits before specializing the cross-section.
- Derive the exact guide dispersion relation and cutoff frequency from k_c.
- Choose the physically decaying below-cutoff branch consistently with exp(+jωt−jβz).
- Distinguish geometric evanescence from conductor or dielectric loss.
- Derive guide wavelength and its divergence at cutoff.
- Derive phase velocity and explain why v_p>v does not imply superluminal information.
- Derive group velocity from dω/dβ and prove v_pv_g=v² in a nondispersive filling.
- Derive TE/TM modal-impedance frequency dependence near cutoff.
- Relate energy velocity to group velocity for one lossless nondispersive mode.
- State how material dispersion changes the simple identities.
- Audit cutoff, wavelength, velocity and modal impedances numerically before rectangular-guide specialization.
The transverse eigenproblem fixes k_c before the propagation constant is known. Chapter 02 then reconstructed complete TE/TM fields for any allowed eigenfunction. We now ask the dynamical question: at a given frequency, does that mode propagate, decay, and with what phase, group delay, guide wavelength and modal impedance? The entire answer begins from one exact dispersion relation, β²=k²−k_c².
0103.1 — Cutoff is the sign change of β²
For a homogeneous guide filled by a nondispersive medium, k=ω√(με). The transverse boundary problem supplies one positive eigenvalue k_c for each non-TEM mode. Longitudinal propagation then satisfies β²=ω²με−k_c².
Define the cutoff angular frequency by ω_c=k_c/√(με). If ω>ω_c, β is real; the +z traveling solution uses β>0 in exp(+jωt−jβz). If ω<ω_c, β² is negative and the mode is evanescent rather than propagating.
Cutoff is therefore not disappearance of the eigenfunction. The transverse field pattern still exists mathematically below cutoff; its longitudinal dependence changes from oscillatory propagation to exponential decay.
Figure 3.1 — What actually changes at cutoff?
One question: how does the same transverse eigenvalue k_c separate propagation from evanescent decay?
Above cutoff, β is real and grows from zero. Below cutoff, oscillatory propagation is replaced by positive decay α_z. The transition comes from the transverse eigenvalue problem; it is not a resonance.
0203.2 — Below cutoff: choose the decaying branch consistently
Below cutoff define α_z=√(k_c²−ω²με)>0. With AoN's exp(+jωt−jβz) convention, the forward-decaying analytic branch is β=−jα_z because exp[−j(−jα_z)z]=exp(−α_z z).
A single decaying evanescent mode in an ideal uniform lossless guide does not transport nonzero average power arbitrarily far in +z; its longitudinal electric and magnetic power-flow contributions are in quadrature. Nevertheless finite below-cutoff sections can participate in reactive coupling or tunnelling when both boundaries are present.
Do not call α_z a conductor/dielectric attenuation constant. Here the decay is geometric cutoff even though the walls and filling medium are ideal.
0303.3 — Guide wavelength stretches and diverges at cutoff
Above cutoff define λ_g=2π/β. Let v=1/√(με) be the bulk wave speed and λ=2π/k the wavelength in the unbounded filling medium. Eliminating β gives λ_g=λ/√(1−(ω_c/ω)²).
Thus λ_g exceeds the bulk-medium wavelength and diverges as the frequency approaches cutoff from above. Far above cutoff, k_c becomes a small correction and λ_g approaches λ.
The guide wavelength describes longitudinal phase repetition. It is not the transverse size of the mode and it is not the free-space wavelength unless the filling medium is vacuum and the mode is far above cutoff.
0403.4 — Phase velocity exceeds the bulk wave speed without carrying information superluminally
The phase velocity along z is v_p=ω/β=v/√(1−(ω_c/ω)²), so v_p>v for every finite frequency above cutoff. Near cutoff it diverges because β tends to zero.
This does not imply that energy, information or a causal modulation travels at v_p. A monochromatic phase front can move faster than the bulk wave speed without violating causality.
The meaningful envelope velocity for a narrowband packet is obtained from the dispersion slope, not from ω/β.
0503.5 — Group velocity follows the dispersion slope and obeys v_p v_g=v²
Differentiate β²=ω²/v²−k_c² while treating k_c and the nondispersive material parameters as frequency-independent. This gives dβ/dω=ω/(v²β), so v_g=(dβ/dω)⁻¹=v²β/ω.
Hence v_g=v√(1−(ω_c/ω)²), which is smaller than v and tends to zero at cutoff. Multiplying by v_p gives the exact nondispersive-guide identity v_p v_g=v².
For a length L, the narrowband group delay is τ_g=L/v_g. Near cutoff this delay grows rapidly, and the strong curvature of β(ω) also makes broadband pulses distort.
0603.6 — TE and TM modal impedances move in opposite directions near cutoff
Chapter 02 found Z_TE=ωμ/β and Z_TM=β/(ωε). Introduce the intrinsic impedance η=√(μ/ε). Using the dispersion relation gives Z_TE=η/√(1−(ω_c/ω)²) and Z_TM=η√(1−(ω_c/ω)²) for propagating modes.
Therefore Z_TE rises without bound as cutoff is approached from above, while Z_TM falls toward zero. Far above cutoff both approach η because the guide mode becomes increasingly plane-wave-like along z.
These are ratios of modal transverse fields. They are not two-conductor characteristic impedances and should not be inserted blindly into circuit formulas that require a uniquely defined terminal voltage/current pair.
0703.7 — Energy velocity and cutoff: what actually slows down
For a lossless nondispersive guide carrying one propagating mode, the longitudinal time-average Poynting flux divided by the stored electromagnetic energy per unit length yields an energy velocity equal to v_g. Thus the energy transport tends to zero as cutoff is approached even while v_p diverges.
The physical picture is not that photons or signals accelerate and then stop. The guided field contains increasing transverse phase structure relative to its longitudinal advance; the same transverse eigenvalue that subtracts k_c² from k² reduces β and the longitudinal energy transport.
In dispersive filling media the stored-energy density requires the appropriate frequency derivatives of material response, and v_pv_g=v² no longer follows in this simple form.
0803.8 — Numerical audit before geometry specialization
Take a vacuum-filled mode with f_c=10 GHz and operate at f=15 GHz. The normalized propagation factor is √(1−(10/15)²)=√5/3≈0.74536.
Hence v_p≈1.34164c, v_g≈0.74536c and v_pv_g=c². The guide wavelength is λ_g=λ/0.74536. Since λ at 15 GHz is about 19.986 mm, λ_g≈26.814 mm.
With η₀≈376.73 Ω, Z_TE≈505.5 Ω while Z_TM≈280.8 Ω. At f=8 GHz, below cutoff, α_z/k_c=√(1−(8/10)²)=0.6, so the amplitude decays by exp(−0.6 k_c z). Chapter 04 will obtain k_c from rectangular geometry instead of prescribing f_c.
Practice — cutoff, dispersion and modal transport
- Starting from β²=k²−k_c² with k=ω/v, derive ω_c and the propagating condition.
- For the exp(+jωt−jβz) convention, show which imaginary branch of β produces decay toward +z below cutoff.
- Derive λ_g=λ/√(1−(ω_c/ω)²). What happens at cutoff and far above cutoff?
- Derive v_p and v_g from the exact dispersion relation and prove v_pv_g=v² under the stated assumptions.
- A vacuum mode has f_c=6 GHz and operates at 10 GHz. Compute v_p/c, v_g/c and λ_g/λ.
- Using Z_TE=ωμ/β and Z_TM=β/(ωε), derive their expressions in terms of η and f_c/f.
- For a vacuum mode with f_c=10 GHz at 15 GHz, compute Z_TE and Z_TM using η₀=376.73 Ω.
- At f=0.8f_c, compute α_z/k_c and the amplitude ratio after a distance z=2/k_c.
- Explain why v_p>c in a vacuum waveguide does not imply superluminal information transfer.
- A narrowband pulse traverses L=0.30 m in a vacuum guide with f_c=8 GHz at f=10 GHz. Compute v_g and group delay; compare with L/c.
Worked solutions
1. Write β²=ω²/v²−k_c². The transition occurs at β=0, so ω_c=vk_c=k_c/√(με). Real β requires ω>ω_c; below that β²<0 and the mode is evanescent.
2. Let β=−jα_z with α_z>0. Then −jβz=−j(−jα_z)z=−α_z z, so the factor is exp(−α_z z). The opposite branch grows toward +z and is not the forward-decaying choice.
3. Since β=k√(1−(ω_c/ω)²), λ_g=2π/β=(2π/k)/√(1−(ω_c/ω)²)=λ divided by the square-root factor. It diverges at cutoff and tends to λ far above cutoff.
4. v_p=ω/β=v/[√(1−(ω_c/ω)²)]. Differentiating β²=ω²/v²−k_c² gives dβ/dω=ω/(v²β), hence v_g=v²β/ω=v√(1−(ω_c/ω)²). Their product is v².
5. The square-root factor is √(1−0.6²)=0.8. Therefore v_p/c=1/0.8=1.25, v_g/c=0.8 and λ_g/λ=1.25.
6. Use β=(ω/v)√(1−(ω_c/ω)²), η=μv=1/(εv). Then Z_TE=η/[√(1−(ω_c/ω)²)] and Z_TM=η√(1−(ω_c/ω)²).
7. The factor is √5/3≈0.74536. Thus Z_TE=376.73/0.74536≈505.5 Ω and Z_TM=376.73×0.74536≈280.8 Ω.
8. α_z/k_c=√(1−0.8²)=0.6. At z=2/k_c the exponent is −α_z z=−1.2, so the amplitude ratio is exp(−1.2)≈0.301.
9. Phase velocity tracks motion of a constant phase of a monochromatic field, not energy or information. The group/energy velocity is below c in this lossless vacuum guide and tends to zero at cutoff.
10. The factor is √(1−0.8²)=0.6, so v_g=0.6c. τ_g=L/(0.6c)≈1.668 ns, whereas L/c≈1.001 ns. The guide adds about 0.667 ns relative to vacuum over 0.30 m.
Chapter 04 will now supply the missing geometry: solve the rectangular cross-section exactly, obtain the TE_mn and TM_mn eigenfunctions, identify the dominant TE_10 mode, and connect the dimensions a,b to cutoff frequencies and field patterns.